Patients with low back pain (LBP) compromise a high proportion of patients with musculoskeletal conditions managed by Physiotherapists. Although LBP is a common condition outcomes for treatment are variable with many patients failing to experience significant reductions in pain and disability (Fritz, 2007).
One strategy proposed for improving treatment outcomes in people with LBP is better identification of prognostic factors indicating an increased risk of a poor outcome, with subsequent treatment targeted towards factors that are modifiable. Several important prognostic factors predictive of chronicity and disability in patients with LBP have been identified. Physical prognostic factors include presence of leg pain or widespread symptoms. Psychosocial factors such as pain related fear, catastrophising, depression, and self-efficacy, also have been identified as important prognostic determinants for patients with LBP.
Recently Rob attended a four day STarT Back training course run by Jonothan Hill and Gail Snowden from Keele University, UK. They have developed and researched a brief, easy to use screening tool, the STarT Back Screening Tool (SBST). The SBST is a valided tool (Hill, 2008) designed to screen primary care patients with LBP for prognostic indicators that are relevant to initial decision making. The instrument is designed to be used by GPs, physiotherapists and pain management practitioners to systematically identify patients ‘at risk’ of persistent symptoms.
The 9-item tool is designed to classify patients into one of three subgroups for targeted primary care management:
Low risk
Medium risk (physical indicators)
High risk (physical and psychological indicators)
The following link has further information including access to the SBST. There is also a 6 item tool developed for use by GPs (it’s quicker).
http://www.keele.ac.uk/research/pchs/pcmrc/dissemination/tools/startback/
The SBST and approach formed the basis of a clinical trial recently run in the UK (data unpublished at this stage). Some observations in the UK were of highly variable decision making in clinical practice, guidelines weren’t helping (e.g. wait and see policy) and sophisticated treatments (i.e. biopsychosocial approach) are better than usual care for LBP.
The key questions were
How best to move on from a ‘one –size fits all’ approach to LBP?
How to reduce inefficient referral mechanisms?
Can patients be stratified into care pathways according to risk of persistent disabling problems?
Is this a cost-effective model of primary care?
The study compared targeted treatment to a ‘care as usual’ control group. This was a large trial with 851 patients randomised between the groups. The figure below illustrates the Keele STarT Back Screening and targeted treatment concept.

The overall results at 4 and 12 months were significant improvements across the groups in: Disability (Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire); Fear avoidance beliefs; Time off work; Patient satisfaction and Qualify of life. Targeted treatment was also cheaper with less consults, medication use and reduced rates of surgery.
The study also highlighted that primary care practitioners who didn’t use the SBST were poor at identifying risk. The patients who filled out the SBST were significantly more likely to receive targeted treatment: 98% vs 60% in the high risk group and 100% vs 65% in the medium risk group.
The targeted treatment was given by Physiotherapists using the STarT back approach and consisted of;
Low risk: assessment, exam, advice, reassurance, secondary prevention and self-management
Medium risk: course of physical therapy treatment, focused on evidence based practice
High risk: course of physiotherapy, enhanced psychosocial factor targeting
The conclusions of the study are that a stratified management approach to primary care with screening and matching pathways significantly improves patient outcomes and is very cost-effective. At Central Bassendean Physiotherapy we are using the SBST and our approach is consistent with targeted treatment approach described above. We would strongly encourage a visit to the website above and use of the SBST. If you have any queries or questions regarding this newsletter we would be happy to discuss this further.